Who Should Be Responsible for Our Operational Security?
Course
Claudio Sangaletti, Marcin Szczepanik, Sam Maesschalck and Blake Gilson debate IT versus OT security ownership, exploring organizational structures and regulatory compliance.
The convergence of IT and OT has blurred traditional boundaries of responsibility, creating both collaboration opportunities and accountability gaps. As cyberthreats increasingly target operational systems, defining ownership over security becomes a strategic imperative. True resilience demands a shared culture - where IT, OT and executive leadership align on risk, response and responsibility. Yet, the question remains: who ultimately leads? Effective governance must balance technical specialization with enterprisewide accountability to embed security into every layer of operations.
In this insightful discussion, senior security leaders will discuss:
- How to define clear roles and shared accountability across IT, OT and executive teams;
 - Building a unified security culture that strengthens resilience and business continuity;
 - Frameworks for converging IT and OT governance to manage risk through collective leadership.
 
Here is the course outline:
            IT vs. OT: Who Should Be Responsible for Our Operational Security? | 
        
Completion
The following certificates are awarded when the course is completed:
![]()  | 
      CPE Credit Certificate | 
        
        
        
        