Skip to content
Banking & Financial Services

Risk, Budget, & Business Alignment


Course
Upgrade subscription below
Contact us

Christian Harter, Jacob McLein and Timothy Kovacik explore how to translate cyber risk into operational terms like downtime and output loss, using safety as universal language to align IT-OT priorities.

OT security teams face constant tension between protecting operations and maintaining output. Safety provides common ground - everyone understands preventing injuries and deaths - but technology pushes toward risky conveniences like remote HMI tablets that could start conveyor belts without visual confirmation. Meanwhile, executives want different information: individual contributors care about tools, managers need capabilities, and senior leaders demand outcomes, not vulnerability counts.

Success requires translating cyber risk into business terms operations teams already understand: downtime, preventative maintenance and output loss. A plant manager measuring productivity doesn't want vulnerability scores; they want to know whether scheduled maintenance now prevents unscheduled shutdowns later.

In this session, you will learn:

  • How to determine adequate security levels by weighing remediation costs against potential downtime and output loss;
  • Techniques to communicate risk in operational terms;
  • Why safety becomes the universal language that aligns IT security teams with OT operations across manufacturing organizations.

Here is the course outline:

The OT Security Balancing Act: Risk, Budget and Business Alignment

Completion

The following certificates are awarded when the course is completed:

CPE Credit Certificate

Floating Button