Christian Harter, Jacob McLein and Timothy Kovacik explore how to translate cyber risk into operational terms like downtime and output loss, using safety as universal language to align IT-OT priorities.
OT security teams face constant tension between protecting operations and maintaining output. Safety provides common ground - everyone understands preventing injuries and deaths - but technology pushes toward risky conveniences like remote HMI tablets that could start conveyor belts without visual confirmation. Meanwhile, executives want different information: individual contributors care about tools, managers need capabilities, and senior leaders demand outcomes, not vulnerability counts.
Success requires translating cyber risk into business terms operations teams already understand: downtime, preventative maintenance and output loss. A plant manager measuring productivity doesn't want vulnerability scores; they want to know whether scheduled maintenance now prevents unscheduled shutdowns later.
In this session, you will learn:
- How to determine adequate security levels by weighing remediation costs against potential downtime and output loss;
- Techniques to communicate risk in operational terms;
- Why safety becomes the universal language that aligns IT security teams with OT operations across manufacturing organizations.
Here is the course outline:
The OT Security Balancing Act: Risk, Budget and Business Alignment |
Completion
The following certificates are awarded when the course is completed:
![]() |
CPE Credit Certificate |
