When Claude Code's launch sent cybersecurity stocks into a dip, markets were reacting to a fundamental question: If artificial intelligence can build, find and fix vulnerabilities autonomously, what happens to the $200 billion security ecosystem built around human teams and point products? The answer is more nuanced - and considerably more uncomfortable - than either the optimists or the panic-sellers suggest.

In this insightful discussion, Anant Shrivastava of Cyfinoid Research and Saikat Datta of DeepStrat discuss:

• Why AI is a multiplier of existing threats rather than a replacement for human judgment in security operations;
• How liability, indemnification and geopolitical dependencies complicate blind trust in AI vendors;
• Why organizations are already consuming AI whether they chose to or not, and what that means for security posture.